The Income Tax
Preis: | 11.95 EUR* (inkl. MWST zzgl. Versand - Preis kann jetzt höher sein!) |
Versand: | 0.00 EUR Versandkostenfrei innerhalb von Deutschland |
Partner: | buecher.de |
Hersteller: | Forgotten Books (Shields, John Knight) |
Stand: | 2015-08-04 03:50:33 |
Produktbeschreibung
Excerpt from The Income Tax: Opinions of Hon. John K. Shields Hon. Cordell Hull and Thurlow M. Gordon on the Proposed Income-Tax Provision of the Pending Tariff Bill The amendment proposed by Senator Root on July 18, 1913, is based upon the theory that the proposed income-tax law can not reach for taxation any income accruing prior to the date of its taking effect, which was required to be taxed under the rule of apportionment under the decision in the Pollock case, even though such income accrued subsequent to the ratification and promulgation of the income-tax amendment to the Constitution. The essence of this contention is that within the meaning of the proposed tax law the tax is limited to the particular income as a specific fund out of which the tax is to be taken, and also that such income becomes principal whenever received, and that principal, therefore, can only be reached for taxation by apportionment, notwithstanding the effect of the recent amendment and the usual method of levying and measuring income taxes by the rule of uniformity as embraced in the proposed law and in former laws and practices of the United States Government. Prior to the Pollock decision Congress had exercised the broadest power to impose the tax on incomes by the rule of uniformity, from whatsoever source derived. The great question raised in the Pollock case did not go to the power of Congress to impose the tax, but to the question of whether the power had been exercised according to the method prescribed by the Constitution - that is to say, whether a power to tax, limited only by one exception and two qualifications, was being used according to the restrictions as to the method prescribed for its exercise. The Pollock decision held that only certain classes of incomes were excise taxes and as such leviable by the rule of uniformity, while certain other classes, viz, rent of real estate, and incomes derived from invested personality, were of such a nature that a tax laid upon the same constituted a direct tax, and which must fall under the rule of apportionment. Prior to this decision the policy of the Government and the decisions of the courts were to the effect that all taxes upon incomes being considered excise taxes might be levied under the rule of uniformity and might be measured by the income accruing during the preceding year or preceding years. The income-tax act of August 5, 1861, provided that the tax should be assessed "upon the annual income for the year preceding the 1st of January, 1862," thus including the income that had accrued during the seven months next preceding the passage of the law. The act of July 14, 1862, required the tax to be imposed upon the income that had accrued during the previous six and one-half months of that year prior to the date of the passage of the act. About the Publisher Forgotten Books publishes hundreds of thousands of rare and classic books. Find more at www.forgottenbooks.com This book is a reproduction of an important historical work. Forgotten Books uses state-of-the-art technology to digitally reconstruct the work, preserving the original format whilst repairing imperfections present in the aged copy. In rare cases, an imperfection in the original, such as a blemish or missing page, may be replicated in our edition. We do, however, repair the vast majority of imperfections successfully; any imperfections that remain are intentionally left to preserve the state of such historical works.
* Preis kann jetzt höher sein. Den aktuellen Stand und Informationen zu den Versandkosten finden sie auf der Homepage unseres Partners.